Silat Practitioner
|
During the 80s to up until the dawn of the 21st
Century, the popularity of Filipino Martial Arts spread at a broader extent abroad.
Together with the spread of FMA, other South East Asian Martial Arts blossomed
abroad also and was accepted by a wide variety of people. Such arts as like
Silat and Muay Thai slowly grew in practitioner population. Famous personages
that were first oriented with East Asian Martial Arts like Karate and Kung fu
also studied and explored these Martial Arts like Dan Inosanto and many others.
This made South East Asian Martial Arts widely popular not just in the US but
also throughout the world, with the US being a great pusher of cultural
products. But what is in South East Asian Martial Arts that it appeals to a
wide range of practitioners even attracting practitioners from ‘Monkish’
traditional East Asian Martial Arts?
![]() |
Filipino Tribesmen |
A lot of practitioners will readily describe South
East Asian Martial Arts as deadly arts mainly because of the orientation in
practice. In FMA, the traditional training would start first with the weapon
training and will proceed to hand-to-hand. In Silat, a lot of very unusual
weapons and techniques firmly rooted from where they come from exist. Muay
Thai, though practiced or regarded as sport, treats the body as weapon and have
derived its movements from weapon based fighting. This is not a special trait
of South East Asian Martial Arts, rather, it’s the history behind these arts
which pushed the practitioners of these arts to mold their techniques into
killing techniques.
As opposed to East Asian Martial Arts which
experienced many years of civil war, South East Asian Martial Arts were exposed
to wars which these nations could not easily thwart because aside from civil
wars, or tribal wars, the history of colonization seeps through the hearts of
these arts. South East Asia, with the exception of Thailand, has become a
favorite spot for colonizers. With the more advanced systems of war that the
colonizers brought to South East Asia, they outmaneuvered a lot of the
resistances from rebels and nationalists. This pushed a lot of modifications in
tactics with the colonized people. Silat practitioners and Eskrimadors learned
to use (but they were already using this long before colonizers) their skills
at a greater disadvantage. Past tribal wars have also honed the fighting
techniques of these people. But with colonization, greater modifications were
created in the Tactics used by the tribes people. Thus, modifying the term
guerilla into something more than just a Spanish owned term. These developments
where better showcased by the Vietnamese, a South East Asian Nation, during the
Vietnam War.
The violence that the old masters of these arts
experienced therefore became ingrained so much in the practice of these arts
that practicing these arts with no weapons is virtually impossible. As opposed
to the “Monkish” practices of East Asian Martial Artist where, because of State
suppression, banned the use of certain weapons, and thereby creating a more
hand-to-hand combat oriented type of fighting, South East Asian Martial Artists
virtually never abandoned the practice of weapons even in their practices today.
This historically ingrained mind-set in the South East
Asian Martial Arts, that there could be war in any time or any place, probably
what makes these arts deadly and appealing both in their practice and their
application.
© K.A.L.Cinco, Tacloban City
No comments:
Post a Comment